Cure8
Multicentre retrospective real-world evidence study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of mirikizumab in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.
Przeglad gastroenterologiczny

Cure8 research brief

Multicentre retrospective real-world evidence study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of mirikizumab in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.

2 min read
Medications Mirikizumab IL-23 inhibitor Clinical study Adult patients Clinicians Researchers Patients On Biologics

Why This Matters

Real-world data show how mirikizumab performs outside clinical trials, especially in patients previously exposed to multiple advanced therapies. That can help patients and clinicians weigh expectations for effectiveness and safety.

Who Should Pay Attention

Adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis, patients on or considering biologics/IL-23 inhibitors, IBD clinicians, and researchers interested in real-world biologic outcomes.

Study Snapshot

Story typeResearch paper
Evidence typeResearch paper
Source depthJournal abstract

What To Know

This retrospective analysis included 257 adults starting mirikizumab across 21 Polish centres, using an intravenous induction (300 mg at weeks 0, 4, 8) with optional extension to week 24 for some patients. The study measured clinical, endoscopic, and laboratory markers at baseline, week 12, and week 24.

The authors report improvements in clinical remission and response rates, endoscopic response, and reductions in inflammatory markers through week 24; corticosteroid-free remission rates and adverse event frequencies are also provided. Safety events were recorded and described as generally favourable.

The report is an abstract-based summary of a multicentre retrospective cohort rather than a randomized trial, so it reflects real-world practice and includes many treatment-exposed patients.

Keep In Mind

This summary is grounded in the article abstract (structured-content depth: abstract). The study is retrospective and observational, which can include selection bias and lacks randomized comparison. Reported rates reflect the study cohort and follow-up to week 24; longer-term outcomes and head-to-head comparisons are not provided here.

Source Details

Review the original publication for the complete reporting, methods, and context.

Read Original Source
Research paper Evidence type derived from source or registry metadata.
PublicationPrzeglad gastroenterologiczny
AuthorsLamparski Ł, Karłowicz K, Tulewicz-Marti E +39 more
Study typeJournal article
Indexed viaEurope PMC
Source typeResearch paper
PublishedMay 14, 2026, 12:00 AM
Content availableJournal abstract

This Cure8 brief is based on source text from the linked article. Cure8 is informational only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Related Reading

Browse latest news →