Cure8

Why This Matters

People with IBD and their clinicians want ways to predict which advanced therapy will work best. This review summarizes current evidence and shows that, despite many studies, no biomarker is reliably ready for routine clinical decision-making.

Who Should Pay Attention

Clinicians choosing or monitoring advanced therapies, researchers developing predictive biomarkers, and patients considering or receiving biologic or targeted IBD treatments.

Study Snapshot

Story typeResearch paper
Evidence typeResearch paper
Source depthJournal abstract

What To Know

This systematic review searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed for primary studies of biomarkers predicting response to advanced therapies in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

It included 55 studies covering blood, serum, fecal, histological, nutrient, genetic and pharmacokinetic markers and assessed baseline predictors of response to anti-TNF agents, ustekinumab, vedolizumab and ozanimod.

Commonly studied tests included C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin, but the review concluded there is inconsistent evidence and no biomarker has yet entered clinical use. The report is presented as an abstract-based systematic-review summary (PROSPERO ID CRD42024559652).

Keep In Mind

This entry is based on the article abstract and systematic-review summary available from the journal; the authors note heterogeneity in study methods and cutoff values and call for larger prospective cohorts before biomarkers can be adopted clinically.

Source Details

Review the original publication for the complete reporting, methods, and context.

Read Original Source
Research paper Evidence type derived from source or registry metadata.
PublicationTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology
AuthorsRadford S, John A, Latino-Kelly A +6 more
Study typeReview, journal article
Indexed viaEurope PMC
Source typeResearch paper
PublishedJul 12, 2026, 12:00 AM
Content availableJournal abstract

This Cure8 brief is based on source text from the linked article. Cure8 is informational only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Related Reading

Browse latest news →