Cure8
Synergistic effects of partial enteral nutrition combined with Ustekinumab in induction and maintenance therapy for Crohn's disease: Real-world experience from a multicentre cohort.
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)

Cure8 research brief

Synergistic effects of partial enteral nutrition combined with Ustekinumab in induction and maintenance therapy for Crohn's disease: Real-world experience from a multicentre cohort.

2 min read
Diet and lifestyle Ustekinumab IL-12/23 inhibitor Intestinal ultrasound Perianal Disease Clinical study Adult patients Clinicians

Why This Matters

Adding partial enteral nutrition to ustekinumab was associated with better clinical, endoscopic, radiologic, and nutritional outcomes at 52 weeks in this multicentre real-world cohort of Crohn’s disease patients. This suggests a potentially simple adjunctive strategy to improve responses to biologic therapy.

Who Should Pay Attention

Adults with Crohn’s disease, particularly patients starting or on ustekinumab, those with stenotic or perianal disease, gastroenterologists, IBD dietitians, and clinicians managing biologic therapy.

Study Snapshot

Story typeResearch paper
Evidence typeResearch paper
Source depthJournal abstract

What To Know

This multicentre observational study from China compared ustekinumab (UST) alone versus UST combined with partial enteral nutrition (PEN ≥900 kcal/day) in people with active Crohn’s disease followed for 52 weeks.

The UST+PEN group (n=72) had higher rates of clinical remission at week 24 and greater deep remission, clinical and endoscopic remission, and radiologic response at week 52; they also showed improvements in anemia and albumin and reductions in inflammatory markers.

The combination appeared to help intestinal stenosis and perianal disease, and benefits showed a dose- and duration-dependent trend for PEN. Both groups had similar tolerability. The study is an observational, real-world multicentre cohort using propensity score weighting to compare groups; it reports associations rather than randomized causal effects.

PEN intake in the combined group had a median of ~1560 kcal/day for a median of 180 days. If you’re considering nutritional strategies alongside biologic therapy, discuss practical details with your clinician (type of enteral formula, calorie targets, duration, monitoring of nutrition and disease activity).

This study suggests PEN may be a useful adjunct to UST, especially in patients with penetrating/stenotic disease, but it is not a randomized trial and practice should be individualized.

Keep In Mind

This is an observational cohort (not randomized); propensity scoring was used to adjust for differences, but residual confounding may remain. The reported benefits are associations from the study abstract; decisions about combining PEN with biologics should involve clinicians and dietitians.

The study reports a median PEN intake and duration but does not replace individualized clinical assessment.

Source Details

Review the original publication for the complete reporting, methods, and context.

Read Original Source
Research paper Evidence type derived from source or registry metadata.
PublicationClinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)
AuthorsBiyao Wang, Yuan Zeng, Lin Han +6 more
InstitutionDepartment of Gastroenterology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Small Bowel Endoscopy, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.
Study typeJournal article, multicenter study
Indexed viaPubMed
Source typeResearch paper
PublishedJun 25, 2026, 12:00 AM
Content availableJournal abstract

Conflict statement: Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This Cure8 brief is based on source text from the linked article. Cure8 is informational only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Related Reading

Browse latest news →