Cure8 research brief
Why This Matters
Many pediatric patients with IBD receive infusion biologic therapies. Shifts in where those infusions happen (driven by payer policies) can create administrative burdens and raise concerns about safety and care coordination.
Who Should Pay Attention
Pediatric IBD clinicians, infusion nurses and centers, caregivers of children receiving biologic infusions, and policymakers or payer decision-makers involved in site-of-care policies.
Study Snapshot
What To Know
This abstract reports a national anonymous web-based survey of pediatric GI clinicians about site-of-care shifts for infusion biologics (Feb 2026).
Respondents rated prior authorization/payer friction as the top pain point and prioritized infusion-site safety (reaction management), reliable communication back to the GI team, patient experience, and pediatric infusion expertise when alternative infusion sites are used.
The survey summarizes clinician perceptions and decision drivers but does not report patient-level outcomes. It reflects clinician experience and attitudes rather than measured safety or efficacy differences across sites.
Practical takeaways: administrative burden (prior auth/payer processes) is a major barrier to site-of-care shifts; safety capability and bidirectional communication are viewed as critical when infusions move away from hospital outpatient departments.
Keep In Mind
This is a clinician survey (JPGN reports abstract). It captures perceptions and priorities but does not provide direct safety or outcome data comparing infusion sites. Findings reflect respondent views (n=100) collected via a pediatric GI listserv in Feb 2026.
Source Details
Review the original publication for the complete reporting, methods, and context.
Conflict statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This Cure8 brief is based on source text from the linked article. Cure8 is informational only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.