Cure8

Why This Matters

Comparative real-world data may help patients and clinicians weigh expected benefits and risks of risankizumab versus ustekinumab in Crohn’s disease, including effects on steroid-free remission and fistula healing.

Who Should Pay Attention

Adults with Crohn's disease, clinicians managing IBD, researchers in biologic therapies, and patients considering or on biologic treatment

Study Snapshot

Story typeResearch paper
Evidence typeResearch paper
Source depthJournal abstract

What To Know

This study reviewed consecutive adults starting risankizumab or ustekinumab from 2020–2025 at a single center. Ustekinumab patients had higher 24-week steroid-free clinical remission overall (82.4% vs 46.7%), a difference driven mainly by biologic‑naïve patients.

Risankizumab-treated patients had higher rates of fistula closure (75% vs 29.4%) and fewer reported adverse events in this cohort. The authors note important limitations: retrospective design, baseline imbalances (risankizumab patients appeared more refractory), and possible confounding, so results are hypothesis-generating rather than definitive.

Keep In Mind

Results come from a retrospective single-center cohort with baseline imbalances and potential confounding; findings are informative but not definitive. The source-level content depth is an abstract summary of a journal article.

Source Details

Review the original publication for the complete reporting, methods, and context.

Read Original Source
Research paper Evidence type derived from source or registry metadata.
PublicationJournal of inflammation research
AuthorsMeng MJ, Lin SH, Chen CM +5 more
Study typeJournal article
Indexed viaEurope PMC
Source typeResearch paper
PublishedAug 17, 2026, 12:00 AM
Content availableJournal abstract

This Cure8 brief is based on source text from the linked article. Cure8 is informational only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Related Reading

Browse latest news →