Cure8
Efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors and mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of fistulizing Crohn’s disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Frontiers in Immunology

Cure8 research brief

Efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors and mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of fistulizing Crohn’s disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

2 min read
Research and clinical trials Anti-TNF Fistula Systematic Review or Meta Analysis Adult patients Clinicians Researchers Patients with Perianal Disease

Why This Matters

This analysis directly addresses treatments commonly used for perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease and compares biologic anti-TNF drugs with emerging mesenchymal stem cell therapy, information that could affect treatment choices and research priorities.

Who Should Pay Attention

Adults with perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease, gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons treating PFCD, clinical researchers studying biologics or stem-cell therapies, and patients weighing fistula-focused versus systemic remission outcomes.

Study Snapshot

Story typeResearch paper
Evidence typeResearch paper
Source depthJournal abstract

What To Know

The study combined 15 randomized controlled trials (2,475 patients) to compare outcomes for fistula remission, fistula response, and clinical remission, and to assess adverse events and infections.

MSCs showed the largest effect sizes and top SUCRA rankings for fistula healing outcomes, whereas anti-TNF therapies showed superior odds for achieving clinical remission. The authors note these are indirect comparisons and call for direct head-to-head trials to confirm comparative effectiveness.

How to use this: If you or your clinician are considering treatment options for perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease, this paper suggests MSCs may perform particularly well for fistula healing whereas anti-TNF drugs remain effective for broader clinical remission.

Treatment decisions should still rely on individualized clinical factors, availability, and guideline recommendations.

Keep In Mind

The report is a network meta-analysis of randomized trials using indirect comparisons; the authors caution that head-to-head randomized trials are needed to confirm whether MSCs are truly superior to anti-TNF agents for fistula healing. The article is an abstract/full-text from Frontiers in Immunology (2026).

Source Details

Review the original publication for the complete reporting, methods, and context.

Read Original Source
Research paper Evidence type derived from source or registry metadata.
PublicationFrontiers in Immunology
PublisherFrontiers Media SA
AuthorsXue-Min Chen, Li-Chun Han, Bing Han +6 more
Study typeJournal Article
Indexed viaCrossref
Source typeResearch paper
PublishedSep 11, 2026, 12:00 AM
Content availableJournal abstract

This Cure8 brief is based on source text from the linked article. Cure8 is informational only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Related Reading

Browse latest news →