Cure8

Why This Matters

Accurate measurement of physical activity matters because it’s linked to symptoms, fitness, and overall health.

This study suggests the common paper questionnaire (GLTEQ HCS) may be less reliable for measuring moderate-to-vigorous activity in people with Crohn’s disease than in healthy adults, which could affect studies or care plans that rely only on self-report.

Who Should Pay Attention

Adult patients with Crohn’s disease, clinicians tracking patient activity, researchers studying physical activity in IBD, and rehabilitation professionals.

Study Snapshot

Story typeResearch paper
Evidence typeResearch paper
Source depthJournal abstract

What To Know

This study tested whether the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire Health Contribution Score (GLTEQ HCS) reflects moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) measured by a waist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in adults with Crohn’s disease (CD) and in healthy control participants.

Researchers had 38 adults with CD and 41 controls wear an accelerometer for 7 days and complete the GLTEQ.

In healthy controls the GLTEQ HCS showed modest correlation with accelerometer-measured MVPA and differences across activity categories; in the CD group the evidence of validity was weaker and did not reach statistical significance except when the GLTEQ was dichotomized into “active” versus “insufficiently active.” The paper’s main point: the GLTEQ HCS has

context-dependent, modest construct validity for estimating MVPA—stronger in healthy controls than in adults with Crohn’s disease, and somewhat better when using a dichotomous cut-point.

If you use the GLTEQ in clinical practice or research with people who have CD, interpret scores cautiously and consider objective activity monitoring when precise MVPA measurement is needed.

Keep In Mind

Structured content depth: abstract — this brief summarizes the journal article abstract from PubMed and does not reflect review of the full published paper beyond the provided abstract. The study sample was modest in size and predominantly female; results were context-dependent and stronger when GLTEQ scores were dichotomized.

Source Details

Review the original publication for the complete reporting, methods, and context.

Read Original Source
Research paper Evidence type derived from source or registry metadata.
PublicationDisability and rehabilitation
AuthorsWhitney N Neal, Erica A Schleicher, Thomas W Buford +4 more
InstitutionDepartment of Health Behavior, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Study typeJournal article
Indexed viaPubMed
Source typeResearch paper
PublishedAug 18, 2026, 12:00 AM
Content availableJournal abstract

This Cure8 brief is based on source text from the linked article. Cure8 is informational only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Related Reading

Browse latest news →