Cure8

Why This Matters

The review helps patients, caregivers, clinicians, and researchers know which caregiver-impact PROMs have some validity evidence in pediatric chronic GI disorders and which tools still need more testing before widespread clinical use.

Who Should Pay Attention

Parents-caregivers; pediatric-patients; clinicians; researchers

Study Snapshot

Story typeResearch paper
Evidence typeResearch paper
Source depthJournal abstract

What To Know

The authors searched multiple databases and included 24 studies covering 26 caregiver-impact tools.

They rated study quality as moderate or low overall and found several measures (for example, PedsQL Family Impact Module, Feeding/Swallowing Impact Survey, POOPC, and WPAI caregiver versions for Crohn’s and UC) had sufficient validity evidence, while many others need further evaluation and cultural validation.

The review highlights a gap: despite many available PROMs, high-level evidence on measurement properties in pediatric chronic GI conditions is limited, so clinicians and researchers should choose measures with demonstrated validity and be cautious when using less-studied tools.

Keep In Mind

Structured content depth is abstract and the record is a preprint; findings are based on the abstracted review and study-quality was rated moderate to low. Further peer review and full-text confirmation may change recommendations.

Source Details

Review the original publication for the complete reporting, methods, and context.

Read Original Source
Research paper Evidence type derived from source or registry metadata.
PublicationEurope PMC
AuthorsGattini D, Maltais-Bilodeau C, Borkhoff CM +4 more
Study typePreprint
Indexed viaEurope PMC
Source typeResearch paper
PublishedAug 25, 2026, 12:00 AM
Content availableJournal abstract

This Cure8 brief is based on source text from the linked article. Cure8 is informational only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Related Reading

Browse latest news →