Cure8

Why This Matters

Adolescents with IBD in this study had higher rates of psychosocial and emotional problems than peers, and maladaptive emotion‑regulation strategies were strongly linked to those problems. That suggests emotion regulation may help identify youth who need extra support.

Who Should Pay Attention

Pediatric patients with IBD; parents and caregivers of teens with IBD; pediatric gastroenterology clinicians and IBD nurses; mental‑health providers working with adolescents with chronic illness; researchers studying psychosocial outcomes in IBD.

Study Snapshot

Story typeResearch paper
Evidence typeResearch paper
Source depthJournal abstract

What To Know

This study used routine psychosocial screening data from three Dutch pediatric IBD centers to examine emotional and psychosocial problems in adolescents (12–17 years) with IBD.

The researchers compared Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) scores to Dutch population norms, estimated prevalence of elevated scores, and tested associations with emotion regulation strategies (measured with the Dutch FEEL‑KJ) and background clinical/demographic factors.

Key findings reported in the abstract: adolescents with IBD had higher psychosocial and emotional problem scores than population norms; 64.3% had elevated total difficulties and 42.9% had elevated emotional problems.

Maladaptive emotion‑regulation strategies showed a strong positive association with both outcomes, while sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were not significantly associated.

What this means for patients and families The paper highlights emotion‑regulation patterns as a potentially useful target to identify adolescents with IBD who are at higher risk for psychosocial or emotional difficulties. Screening that includes emotion‑regulation assessments could help direct timely psychosocial support or interventions.

Note on the source This classification and brief are grounded in the article abstract provided by JPGN Reports (Wiley). The abstract-level summary does not report intervention results; it describes associations observed in cross‑sectional screening data.

Keep In Mind

Structured content depth: abstract — the notes and takeaways are based on the article abstract provided by the journal. The study reports associations from routine screening data; it does not establish causation or test interventions. Details on sample size, measures, and statistical adjustments are limited to the abstract.

Source Details

Review the original publication for the complete reporting, methods, and context.

Read Original Source
Research paper Evidence type derived from source or registry metadata.
PublicationJPGN Reports
PublisherWiley
AuthorsSandra Jansen‐Kamphorst, Romy Snetselaar, Juliette Greidanus +4 more
Study typeJournal Article
Indexed viaCrossref
Source typeResearch paper
PublishedNov 3, 2026, 12:00 AM
Content availableJournal abstract

This Cure8 brief is based on source text from the linked article. Cure8 is informational only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Related Reading

Browse latest news →