Cure8
Frequent Use of Restricted Oral Intake During Hospitalization for IBD Flares Was Not Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.
Digestive diseases and sciences

Cure8 research brief

Frequent Use of Restricted Oral Intake During Hospitalization for IBD Flares Was Not Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

2 min read
Diet and lifestyle Clinical study Adult patients Clinicians Newly Diagnosed Post Surgery Patients Inflammatory bowel disease Crohn's disease

Why This Matters

This study suggests routine restriction of oral intake during IBD flares (without obstruction/abscess/fistula) is common but not linked to better short-term outcomes, so unnecessary fasting may be avoidable for many hospitalized patients.

Who Should Pay Attention

Adult patients with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis hospitalized for flares, inpatient clinicians, hospital dietitians, and caregivers.

Study Snapshot

Story typeResearch paper
Evidence typeResearch paper
Source depthJournal abstract

What To Know

This multicenter retrospective cohort study reviewed 315 hospitalized IBD flare admissions (Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, and IBDU) from 2015–2020 and measured time spent nil per os (NPO) or on clear liquids. Most patients (90%) experienced at least one period of restricted oral intake, averaging about one-third of the hospital stay.

Greater duration of NPO/clear-liquid diet was not associated with lower 30- or 90-day readmission, unplanned surgery, or inpatient biologic use, including in Crohn’s and ulcerative colitis subgroups.

The report supports current guideline thinking that routine dietary restriction during IBD flares — in the absence of obstruction, abscess, fistula, or other clear indications — is unlikely to improve short-term clinical outcomes. This study is retrospective, so it can show associations but not prove cause and effect.

If you are hospitalized with an IBD flare, ask your care team whether dietary restrictions are necessary for a specific medical reason rather than being applied routinely.

Keep In Mind

Structured content depth: abstract — the summary is grounded in the journal abstract available on PubMed. The study is retrospective and observational; results show associations, not causation. The cohort excluded patients with obstruction, abscess, fistula, elective surgery, or new diagnoses, so findings apply to inflammatory flares without those complications.

Source Details

Review the original publication for the complete reporting, methods, and context.

Read Original Source
Research paper Evidence type derived from source or registry metadata.
PublicationDigestive diseases and sciences
AuthorsVincent Phan, Natalie Malluru, Jonathan Espinoza +6 more
InstitutionDepartment of Medicine, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Health Discovery Building, 1601 Trinity Street, Building B, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Study typeJournal article
Indexed viaPubMed
Source typeResearch paper
PublishedSep 18, 2026, 12:00 AM
Content availableJournal abstract

Conflict statement: Declarations. Conflict of interest: None relevant to this manuscript for any author. LAF has research funding, paid to their institution, for participation in industry-sponsored trials from Takeda, Johnson & Johnson, and CorEvitas.

This Cure8 brief is based on source text from the linked article. Cure8 is informational only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Related Reading

Browse latest news →