Cure8
Endoscopic intralesional platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection after balloon dilation for colonic Crohn's disease strictures: a pilot study
Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Cure8 research brief

Endoscopic intralesional platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection after balloon dilation for colonic Crohn's disease strictures: a pilot study

2 min read
Procedures and surgery Intestinal ultrasound Clinical study Crohn's disease

Why This Matters

Patients and clinicians exploring new, less-invasive options for fibrostenotic colonic Crohn's disease may be interested because this study reports that intralesional PRP after balloon dilation is feasible and appears safe, but restenosis remained common.

Who Should Pay Attention

Adult patients with colonic Crohn's disease strictures, gastroenterologists who perform endoscopic dilation, and researchers designing trials of endoscopic adjuncts for fibrostenotic IBD.

Study Snapshot

Story typeResearch paper
Evidence typeResearch paper
Source depthJournal abstract

What To Know

This was a prospective, single-arm pilot trial reporting feasibility and safety of endoscopic intralesional PRP after EBD for colonic CD strictures. PRP injections (1–2 mL at several points) were given into the dilated segment after balloon dilation. The study found no adverse events directly attributed to PRP.

Two delayed hemorrhages were linked to concurrent polypectomy and one perforation occurred from balloon dilation (managed endoscopically). Restenosis—defined as inability to pass a 10.5-mm scope—occurred in nearly half of patients by 3 weeks and in most patients by 1 year, and intestinal ultrasound measurements did not show meaningful improvement.

Because this is a small, single-arm pilot with no control group, it cannot establish whether PRP helps prevent restenosis; its main contribution is a safety signal and benchmark restenosis rates to guide future research.

Keep In Mind

This is a small, single-arm pilot (29 patients) reported as an abstract/full-text on Research Square (posted-content) with structured-content depth labeled as an abstract. It sets a safety benchmark but cannot demonstrate efficacy without a controlled trial or larger studies with repeat dosing or comparator arms.

Source Details

Review the original publication for the complete reporting, methods, and context.

Read Original Source
Research paper Evidence type derived from source or registry metadata.
PublicationSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
AuthorsYi Lu, Tao Yang, Jing Li +10 more
Study typePosted Content
Indexed viaCrossref
Source typeResearch paper
PublishedOct 11, 2026, 12:00 AM
Content availableJournal abstract

This Cure8 brief is based on source text from the linked article. Cure8 is informational only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Related Reading

Browse latest news →