Cure8
The Diagnostic Accuracy of Fecal Calprotectin for Colonoscopic Abnormalities in Patients With Chronic Diarrhea.
Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology

Cure8 research brief

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Fecal Calprotectin for Colonoscopic Abnormalities in Patients With Chronic Diarrhea.

2 min read
Tests and monitoring Fecal calprotectin Colonoscopy Diarrhea Clinical study Clinicians Adult patients Newly Diagnosed

Why This Matters

Fecal calprotectin measured by a point‑of‑care CGICA assay showed high accuracy for identifying colorectal inflammation and IBD in patients with chronic diarrhea, which could help avoid some unnecessary colonoscopies when pretest probability is low.

This directly matters to people with chronic diarrhea and clinicians deciding who needs urgent colonoscopy versus noninvasive evaluation.

Who Should Pay Attention

Patients with chronic diarrhea; clinicians who evaluate and triage lower GI symptoms; labs and researchers working on fecal biomarkers for IBD.

Study Snapshot

Story typeResearch paper
Evidence typeResearch paper
Source depthJournal abstract

What To Know

This multicenter prospective diagnostic study evaluated a colloidal gold immunochromatographic assay fecal calprotectin (CGICA‑FC) test in patients with chronic diarrhea who all underwent colonoscopy.

The study reports cutoff values and AUCs showing high accuracy for detecting colorectal inflammation and particularly inflammatory bowel disease (higher cutoffs and AUCs for IBD than for high‑risk adenomas).

The authors emphasize a high negative predictive value, suggesting the test could help triage patients and reduce unnecessary colonoscopies in low‑pretest‑probability groups. The study enrolled 556 patients with chronic diarrhea and 152 controls across 15 centers in China and registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300070117).

FC levels correlated positively with colorectal inflammation and alcohol use and negatively with BMI. This brief summarizes the article abstract from the Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Cure8 did not review full text beyond the provided abstract.

Keep In Mind

Findings are from a prospective multicenter study summarized in the article abstract; performance may differ by assay type, population prevalence, and clinical setting. The assay performed poorly for high‑risk adenomas, so it should not replace colonoscopy when neoplasia is suspected.

Source Details

Review the original publication for the complete reporting, methods, and context.

Read Original Source
Research paper Evidence type derived from source or registry metadata.
PublicationJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology
AuthorsXinghuang Liu, Binbin Liu, Xia Tian +24 more
InstitutionDivision of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Study typeJournal article
Indexed viaPubMed
Source typeResearch paper
PublishedJul 20, 2026, 12:00 AM
Content availableJournal abstract

This Cure8 brief is based on source text from the linked article. Cure8 is informational only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Related Reading

Browse latest news →